The innocence of the McCann’s: The definitive word.

It is often repeated on the more puerile and ignorant Madeleine related websites that the only reason Kate and Gerry are still free is because there was insufficient evidence to bring charges against them. But then the Mars Bars contradict themselves by saying ALL the evidence points to the fact that Madeleine died in the apartment. Well, which is it? Is there ‘a mountain of evidence,’ as one of the more mentally deficient idiots once said, pointing to the McCann’s guilt? Or is there not yet enough evidence to bring charges, but a good chance that, any day now, something that was overlooked by the ‘Brilliant detective’ will come to light? And what of the contemptible, attention seeking fool bennett, and the comment he repeats in almost all of his letters to anyone and everyone, reminding them that the McCann’s are still official suspects in their daughter’s disappearance? Is there any truth in that?

Well here, for the education of the more cerebrally challenged members of the anti-Madeleine websites, is the translated, full version of the summing up of the case by the Portuguese chief prosecutor himself. Please note, this is an expert in his field, a man of considerable prominence within the legal profession, someone who has forgotten more about the due process of the law than bennett ever knew, and unlike bennett is not someone who was dismissed for bringing his noble profession into disrepute.

– Despite all of this, it was NOT POSSIBLE to obtain ANY piece of evidence (Note very carefully, this is saying quite clearly that there is NO evidence, NOT insufficient evidence, but NO evidence) that would allow for an average man, under the light of the criteria of LOGIC, of NORMALITY and of the general rules of experience, to formulate ANY LUCID, SENSATE, SERIOUS AND HONEST conclusion about the circumstances under which the child was removed from the apartment (whether dead or alive, whether killed in a neglectful homicide or an intended homicide, whether the victim of a targeted abduction or an opportunistic abduction), nor even to produce a consistent prognosis about her destiny and inclusively – the most dramatic – to establish whether she is still alive or if she is dead, or which seems more likely.

…… we do not possess any minimally solid and rigorous foundation in order to be able to state, with the safety that is requested, which was or were the exact and precise crime(s) that was or were practised on the person of the minor Madeleine McCann – apart from the SUPPOSED BUT DISMISSED CRIME OF EXPOSURE OR ABANDONMENT (That means the idea of neglect was considered, but then dismissed: She was NOT neglected in the eyes of the law.) – or to hold anyone responsible over its authorship.

Therefore, after all seen, analysed and duly pondered, with all that is left exposed, it is determined:

a) The archiving of the Process concerning arguido Robert James Queriol Eveleigh Murat, because there are no indications of the practise of any crime under the dispositions of article 277 number 1 of the Penal Process Code;

b) The archiving of the Process concerning arguidos Gerald Patrick McCann and Kate Marie Healy, BECAUSE THERE ARE NO INDICATIONS OF THE PRACTISE OF ANY CRIME (Just how much more clearer can that be? NO indications that they committed any crime. Period. Full stop. The end.) under the dispositions of article 277 number 1 of the Penal Process Code.

Article 277 number 3 of the Penal Process Code is to be fulfilled.

Under article 214 number 1 item a) of the Penal Process Code, the coercion measures that have been imposed on the arguidos are declared extinct.

The NON INVOLVEMENT (Meaning exactly what it says: Innocent.) of the Arguidos parents of Madeleine in ANY PENALLY RELEVANT ACTION (Meaning they committed NO crime.) seems to result from the objective circumstances of them not being inside the apartment when she disappeared, from the NORMAL BEHAVIOUR (NORMAL, get it, NORMAL, NOT suspicious.) that they adopted until said disappearance AND AFTERWARDS, (STILL not acting in any way suspicious.) as can be amply concluded from the witness statements, from the TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS ANALYSIS (Because, despite the lies and slurs bandied about by the repulsive bennett, the McCanns DID cooperate with the PJ, and DID give their phone records, with the times, dates, callers and recipients ALL logged in the official files. You know, the files that the anti-Madeleine’s love to talk about, but in truth have never actually read themselves.) and also from the forensics’ conclusions, namely the Reports from the FSS and from the National Institute for Legal Medicine.

To this can be added that, in reality, NONE of the indications that led to their constitution as arguidos WAS LATER CONFIRMED OR CONSOLIDATED. (In other words, the prosecutor could clearly see that amaral had NOTHING, repeat NOTHING on them. He had nothing on them then, and he has nothing on them now. Zero. Zip. Nada. Zilch.) If not, let us see: the information concerning a previous alert of the media before the police was not confirmed, the traces that were marked by the dogs WERE NOT RATIFIED IN LABORATORY, and the initial indications from the above transcribed email, better clarified at a later date, ended up being revealed as INNOCUOUS. (Again, how clear can that be? The dogs indication were not backed up by one of the best forensics laboratories in the world. The dogs made a mistake. They didn’t lie, they simply indicated at something other than the scent of a corpse. It happens, they are NOT infallible.)
Even if, hypothetically, one could admit that Gerald and Kate McCann might be responsible over the child’s death, it would still have to be explained how, where through, when, with what means, with the help of whom and where to they freed themselves of her body within the restricted time frame that would have been available to them to do so. Their daily routine, until the 3rd of May, had been circumscribed to the narrow borders of the ‘Ocean Club’ resort and to the beach that lies next to it, unknowing the surrounding terrain and, apart from the English friends that were with them on holiday there, they had no known friends or contacts in Portugal.

How, where, when? Questions not one, single, anti-Madeleine has ever successfully answered. Why? Because Kate and Gerry had nothing to do with it.

There is absolutley no ambiguity in this report: No margins for discussion, no ‘Wriggle room.’ It states quite clearly that Kate and Gerry are innocent of any crime. There IS no evidence against them, none whatsoever. All the speculation, gossip and innuendo in the world will not solve this case, only good, old fashioned detective work. Pity then, that the first detective on the job was woefully inadequate, and fell far short of the expectations placed on him and, being as bent as a nine pound note, prefered to line his own pockets at Madeleine’s expense, damning her to her fate with a glass of wine in a sea food restaurant.

Oh, and just for you, bennett. No, the McCann’s are NOT still official suspects in the case. When they were cleared of arguido status, any legal or official suspicion, if there ever even was any, given that the word arguido is open to interpretation, ended right there and then. Further, Kate and Gerry were NEVER made suspects at any time by Leicestershire police, Scotland Yard, the C.I.D. or any other police force in Britain or any other country. They are NOT official suspects. And that is an indisputable and incontravertable fact.

Now, exactly what part of ‘Kate and Gerry are innocent’ do you not understand?


11 Responses to “The innocence of the McCann’s: The definitive word.”

  1. Deuce Says:

    I think those people who regard the McCanns as still official suspects base their opinion on the opinion of Chief Inspector Tavares de Almeida, who believes Madeleine died in the apartment and was concealed under a made up kidnapping. That opinion, I believe, based around the INCONCLUSIVE DNA results. So the opinion Madeleine died has no weight. The forensic results of Two laboratory’s proved that.

    The PJ presented the prosecutor with all the files. After digesting all the information he obviously recognised the fact that the evidence being used to form the opinion Madeleine died, is not any evidence at all. Therefore he had no choice but to give the LAWFUL conclusion as you have stated above.

    No evidence of any crime, means no evidence to suspect who is a criminal, means the McCanns are no more suspects than the whole of the human race.

  2. Tony Winters Says:

    I fully agree with Deuce.

  3. Pedro Silva Says:

    Vee, Deuce, I agree with you both.

  4. Cath the one and only Says:

    Well said Vee. And let’s all remember the words of José Magalhães e Menezes when he was asked what the probability was of Madeleine “still being alive”, and replied that it was “equally probable” that she was alive as it was she was dead.

  5. Sabot Says:

    Any chance of someone posting this on MM? Yes, I am serious. I doubt it would last long, but it might be interesting to see what they do with it.

    Just the bit from The Portuguese Chief Prosecutor will do, although I would prefer all of it.

  6. Pedro Silva Says:

    My friends, I have said this many times, but I say it again: until evidence otherwise from the PI´s, everything we do is based on this: she can still be alive, she can still be found alive.

  7. CAT Says:

    Well said Vee………….but don’t expect the nasties to comprehend it.

  8. Karin Williams Says:

    In his so called “Documentary” part of The Truth of the Lie, Goncalo Amaral contradicts his OWN theory. He begins by telling us (following images of the dogs ‘finding’ of the dead body in the cupboard), that the Mccanns hid their daughter’s corpse in the cupboard. He later reaches the ‘conclusion’ that Madeleine died by accident as she tried to reach the window from the sofa, over-balanced, and hit her head. It was Gerry who found her, very soon after she died, and he immediately picked the dead child up in his arms, walked her down to the beach, and threw her body in the ocen. SO- WHEN DID HER BODY GET STORED IN THE CUPBOARD, Amaral? Mr. Amaral must have watched the footage he put together hundreds of times, putting C grade ‘horror movie’ music under the words, deciding what footage to keep and what to discard, monitoring his own performance and keeping and cutting the parts he wanted and did not want etc… How then, is it possible that he went to all that trouble and managed to miss the fact that he contradicted his own ‘theory’? How is it that all the Mccann haters who have consistently used Mr. Amaral’s ‘theory’, pointing whoever will follow to his ‘documentary’, never picked it up either? Well, my theory is that Mr. Amaral, aside from being an opportunist of the worst kind, is also rather stupid. I am no cop, but I picked this contradiction up as soon as I saw it! How on earth did this man ever become a police man, let alone the head of an investigation into a mssing child? He fits extremely well as the ‘guru’ for the Mccann haters, who are all profoundly ignorant, judgemental, uneducated and full of a kind of venom that really has nothing to do with Madeleine Mccann. If they truly believed they were acting for ‘justice’ for this child, then what is the purpose of them hiding under fake ID’s on the web, and never revealing who they really are? The level of ignorance displayed by these haters, is truly frightening, because they refuse to move on from entirely disproven theories, and will never accept any opinion that is different from their own. If Madeleine Mccann were found tomorrow, they would needless come up with some kind of conspiracy about her being a clone developed in secret by Kate and Gerry. It would all be very funny, if it were not so tragic. These people are cowards of the worst possible kind, who hide behind their computer screens, where they feel a false sense of power, because, in the ‘real’ world, their opinions would not get a hearing, let alone a ‘published’ space.

  9. elena mitchell Says:

    Well said, Karin.

  10. Hilary Lenton Says:

    One thing that the McCann ‘detractors’ seem to misunderstand is the so called ‘lack of evidence’ of an abduction.

    There was a case in Australia, where the criminal was dubbed “Mr. Cruel” by the press and people. He stole several young girls from their homes, molested them and then threw them out of his car in a blanket. Sadly, he killed his last young victim.

    “Mr. Cruel” also left not one single trace of forensic evidence. Nor did he ever show his face to his surviving victims, as it was sufficiently covered. The taskforce set up to investigate this crime gave a pfofile of a criminal that was of exceptionally high intelligence, and someone with a background in forensics, science, certain starnds of medicin and/or high end law enforcement.

    I use the above to illustrate the fact that lack of forensic evidence is not proof that no abduction took place in the case of Madeleine McCann. I believe Madeleine was abducted by a similarly ‘brilliant’ man who knew how to leave no trace of himself. I also believe that he opened the window in an attempt to put the police of track and/or to create question marks around the parents version of events and/or involvement in the case.

    In other words, the abductor got precisely what he wanted, and more – a police force, a media, and certain members of the public who focussed on everything and everyone but himself! This is not about ‘nations’, for I am not English or Portuguese. But in this case, I say shame on the Portuguese police for not taking this obvious possibility into account at the start where the first 48 hours are the most crucial of all, in terms of possibly saving an innocent chld.

  11. Hilary Lenton Says:

    Just letting you know that I do know how to spell ‘off’ and tha ‘of’ was a typo! No way of changing it on here. (I am referring to my above comment) Thanks.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: